e-journal
Non-Violations
The ‘non-violation nullification or impairment’ doctrine is among the more unique
and perplexing features of WTO law. We examine the scope and application of the
non-violation doctrine in the GATT/WTO. Observed cases raising non-violation
claims are relatively uncommon, the non-violation claims that are observed are usually
not adjudicated, and those that are adjudicated are unsuccessful in a relatively high percentage
of cases. This article offers a number of reasons for the relatively modest
(observed) role of the non-violation doctrine over the history of the GATT/WTO system.
We report the results of a formal model developed in a companion paper, which
can deliver differences in equilibrium usage of violation and non-violation claims that
mirror these broad features. We note that although non-violation claims are not often
observed and when observed are less successful, they can still serve a valuable role in
the GATT/WTO, owing in part to their ‘off equilibrium’ effects. We develop a range
of other considerations informally, which further help to explain the limited role of
non-violation claims in the system and hint at some possible reforms to clarify its
proper scope.
Tidak ada salinan data
Tidak tersedia versi lain