Elibrary Perpustakaan Universitas Riau

Ebook, artikel jurnal dan artikel ilmiah

  • Beranda
  • Informasi
  • Berita
  • Bantuan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Arab Bahasa Bengal Bahasa Brazil Portugis Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Spanyol Bahasa Jerman Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Jepang Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Persia Bahasa Rusia Bahasa Thailand Bahasa Turki Bahasa Urdu

Pencarian berdasarkan :

SEMUA Pengarang Subjek ISBN/ISSN Pencarian Spesifik

Pencarian terakhir:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
No image available for this title
Penanda Bagikan

e-journal

The Climate Policy Dilemma

Robert S. Pindyck - Nama Orang;

Most environmental problems—for example, SOx and NOx emissions from coal-burning power plants—are amenable to standard benefit-cost analysis. There will always be uncertainties over the benefits and costs of any proposed abatement policy, but the characteristics and extent of those uncertainties will usually be well understood and comparable in nature to the uncertainties concerning many other public and private policy or investment decisions. Of course, economists can (and will) argue about the details of the analysis. But at a basic level, we’re in well-charted territory and confident that we know what we’re doing. If we come to the
conclusion that a policy to reduce SOx emissions by a particular amount is warranted, that conclusion will be viewed, at least by most economists, as defensible and reasonable.
Not so with climate change. Climate policy poses a serious dilemma for environmental economists. In part because of declining economic growth and rising unemployment in much of the world, there has been waning political enthusiasm for implementing stringent greenhouse gas (GHG) abatement policies, and climate change is taking a back seat to other environmental—and nonenvironmental—policy problems. More importantly, the economic argument for stringent GHG abatement is far from clear. There is disagreement among both climate scientists and economists over the likelihood of alternative climate outcomes, as well as the nature and extent of the uncertainty of those outcomes. There is also disagreement about the framework that should be used to evaluate the potential benefits from an abatement policy, including the social welfare function and the discount rate to be used to put future welfare benefits from abatement in present value terms. These disagreements make climate policy both difficult to evaluate and hard to sell to the general public.


Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
No. Panggil
-
Penerbit
: Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists., 2013
Deskripsi Fisik
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, volume 7, issue 2, 2013, pp. 219–237
Bahasa
English
ISBN/ISSN
-
Klasifikasi
-
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
-
Subjek
EKONOMI
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
agus
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
  • The Climate Policy Dilemma
Komentar

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar

Elibrary Perpustakaan Universitas Riau
  • Informasi
  • Layanan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota

Tentang Kami

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Cari

masukkan satu atau lebih kata kunci dari judul, pengarang, atau subjek

Donasi untuk SLiMS Kontribusi untuk SLiMS?

© 2025 — Senayan Developer Community

Ditenagai oleh SLiMS
Pilih subjek yang menarik bagi Anda
  • Karya Umum
  • Filsafat
  • Agama
  • Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
  • Bahasa
  • Ilmu-ilmu Murni
  • Ilmu-ilmu Terapan
  • Kesenian, Hiburan, dan Olahraga
  • Kesusastraan
  • Geografi dan Sejarah
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Pencarian Spesifik
Kemana ingin Anda bagikan?