Elibrary Perpustakaan Universitas Riau

Ebook, artikel jurnal dan artikel ilmiah

  • Beranda
  • Informasi
  • Berita
  • Bantuan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Arab Bahasa Bengal Bahasa Brazil Portugis Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Spanyol Bahasa Jerman Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Jepang Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Persia Bahasa Rusia Bahasa Thailand Bahasa Turki Bahasa Urdu

Pencarian berdasarkan :

SEMUA Pengarang Subjek ISBN/ISSN Pencarian Spesifik

Pencarian terakhir:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
No image available for this title
Penanda Bagikan

e-journal

A POSITIVE THEORY AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC WORD CHOICE IN DISTRICT COURT OPINIONS

Rachael K. Hinkle - Nama Orang; Andrew D. Martin - Nama Orang; Jonathan David Shaub - Nama Orang; Emerson H. Tiller - Nama Orang;

ABSTRACT
Supported by numerous empirical studies on judicial hierarchies and panel effects,
Positive Political Theory (PPT) suggests that judges engage in strategic use of opinion
content—to further the policy outcomes preferred by the decision-making court. In this
study, we employ linguistic theory to study the strategic use of opinion content at a
granular level—investigating whether the specific word choices judges make in their
opinions is consistent with the competitive institutional story of PPT regarding judicial
hierarchies. In particular, we examine the judges’ pragmatic use of the linguistic operations
known as “hedging”—language serving to enlarge the truth set for a particular
proposition, rendering it less definite and therefore less assailable—and “intensifying”—
language restricting the possible truth-value of a proposition and making a statement
more susceptible to falsification. Our principal hypothesis is that district court
judges not ideologically aligned with the majority of the overseeing circuit judges use
more hedging language in their legal reasoning in order to insulate these rulings from
reversal. We test the theory empirically by analyzing constitutional criminal procedure,
racial and sexual discrimination, and environmental opinions in the federal district courts
from 1998 to 2001. Our results demonstrate a statistically significant increase in the use of
certain types of language as the ideological distance between a district court judge and
the overseeing circuit court judges increases.


Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
Journal of Legal Analysis
No. Panggil
-
Penerbit
Oxford : Oxford University Press on behalf of The John M. Olin Center for Law., 2012
Deskripsi Fisik
Winter 2012: Volume 4, Number 2 , Journal of Legal Analysis
Bahasa
English
ISBN/ISSN
-
Klasifikasi
-
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
-
Subjek
HUKUM
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
agus
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
  • A POSITIVE THEORY AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC WORD CHOICE IN DISTRICT COURT OPINIONS
Komentar

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar

Elibrary Perpustakaan Universitas Riau
  • Informasi
  • Layanan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota

Tentang Kami

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Cari

masukkan satu atau lebih kata kunci dari judul, pengarang, atau subjek

Donasi untuk SLiMS Kontribusi untuk SLiMS?

© 2025 — Senayan Developer Community

Ditenagai oleh SLiMS
Pilih subjek yang menarik bagi Anda
  • Karya Umum
  • Filsafat
  • Agama
  • Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
  • Bahasa
  • Ilmu-ilmu Murni
  • Ilmu-ilmu Terapan
  • Kesenian, Hiburan, dan Olahraga
  • Kesusastraan
  • Geografi dan Sejarah
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Pencarian Spesifik
Kemana ingin Anda bagikan?