e-journal

MORAL REALISM AND THE HEURISTICS DEBATE

---

ABSTRACT
There has been substantial debate about whether certain forms of universal moral intuitions
“exist” —intuitions that are non-reflective and undefended—and, if so, whether
these intuitions have a privileged normative status. This debate arguably has implications
for jurisprudential debates about the existence of “natural law.” This essay explores
the underappreciated homology between one instantiation of the debates about the
nature and quality of intuitive “moral” reasoning, and debates, associated with
the Heuristics and Biases (H&B) school and the “Fast and Frugal” (F&F) school, about
the nature and quality of our capacity to make “self-interested” decisions.

---

Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

Journal of Legal Analysis

No. Panggil

-

Penerbit

Oxford : Oxford University Press on behalf of The John M. Olin Center for Law., 2013

Deskripsi Fisik

Winter 2013: Volume 5, Number 2 ~ Journal of Legal Analysis

Bahasa

English

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

-

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

agus

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar