Elibrary Perpustakaan Universitas Riau

Ebook, artikel jurnal dan artikel ilmiah

  • Beranda
  • Informasi
  • Berita
  • Bantuan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Arab Bahasa Bengal Bahasa Brazil Portugis Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Spanyol Bahasa Jerman Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Jepang Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Persia Bahasa Rusia Bahasa Thailand Bahasa Turki Bahasa Urdu

Pencarian berdasarkan :

SEMUA Pengarang Subjek ISBN/ISSN Pencarian Spesifik

Pencarian terakhir:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
No image available for this title
Penanda Bagikan

e-journal

THE DECISION TO AWARD PUNITIVE DAMAGES: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY

Theodore Eisenberg - Nama Orang; Michael Heise - Nama Orang; Nicole L.Waters - Nama Orang; Martin T.Wells - Nama Orang;

ABSTRACT
Empirical studies have consistently shown that punitive damages are rarely
awarded, with rates of about 3 to 5 percent of plaintiff trial wins. Using the 2005
data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics Civil Justice Survey, this article shows
that knowing in which cases plaintiffs sought punitive damages transforms the picture
of punitive damages. Not accounting for whether punitive damages were
sought obscures the meaningful punitive damages rate, the rate of awards in
cases in which they were sought, by a factor of nearly 10, and obfuscates a more
explicable pattern of awards than has been reported. Punitive damages were surprisingly
infrequently sought, with requests found in about 10 percent of tried cases
that plaintiffs won. State laws restricting access to punitive damages were significantly
associated with rates of seeking punitive damages. Punitive damages were
awarded in about 30 percent of the plaintiff trial wins in which they were sought.
Awards were most frequent in cases of intentional tort, with a punitive award
rate of over 60 percent. Greater harm corresponded to a greater probability of
an award: the size of the compensatory award was significantly associated with
whether punitive damages were awarded, with a rate of approximately 60 percent
for cases with compensatory awards of $1 million or more. Regression models correctly
classify about 70 percent or more of the punitive award request outcomes.


Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
Journal of Legal Analysis
No. Panggil
-
Penerbit
Oxford : Oxford University Press on behalf of The John M. Olin Center for Law., 2010
Deskripsi Fisik
Fall 2010: Volume 2, Number 2 ~ Journal of Legal Analysis
Bahasa
English
ISBN/ISSN
-
Klasifikasi
-
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
-
Subjek
HUKUM
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
agus
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
  • THE DECISION TO AWARD PUNITIVE DAMAGES: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY
Komentar

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar

Elibrary Perpustakaan Universitas Riau
  • Informasi
  • Layanan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota

Tentang Kami

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Cari

masukkan satu atau lebih kata kunci dari judul, pengarang, atau subjek

Donasi untuk SLiMS Kontribusi untuk SLiMS?

© 2025 — Senayan Developer Community

Ditenagai oleh SLiMS
Pilih subjek yang menarik bagi Anda
  • Karya Umum
  • Filsafat
  • Agama
  • Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
  • Bahasa
  • Ilmu-ilmu Murni
  • Ilmu-ilmu Terapan
  • Kesenian, Hiburan, dan Olahraga
  • Kesusastraan
  • Geografi dan Sejarah
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Pencarian Spesifik
Kemana ingin Anda bagikan?