e-journal

Does the Defining Issues Test Measure Ethical Judgment Ability or Political Position?

---

This article addresses the construct validity of the Defining Issues Test of ethical judgment (DIT/DIT-2). Alleging a political bias in the test, Emler and colleagues (1983, 1998, 1999, 2007), show that conservatives score higher when asked to fake as liberals, implying that they understand the reasoning associated with “higher” moral development but avoid items they see as liberally biased. DIT proponents challenge the internal validity of faking studies, advocating an explained-variance validation. This study takes a new approach: Adult participants complete the DIT-2, then evaluate the raw responses of others to discern political orientation and ethical development. Results show that individuals scoring higher on the DIT-2 rank others’ ethical judgment in a way consistent with DIT-2-based rankings. Accuracy at assessing political orientation, however, is low. Results support the DIT-2’s validity as a measure of ethical development, not an expression of political position.

Keywords: construct validity, defining issues test, moral judgment, political orientation

---

Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

The Journal of Social Psychology

No. Panggil

-

Penerbit

: Taylor & Francis., 2011

Deskripsi Fisik

The Journal of Social Psychology, 2011, 151(3), 314–330

Bahasa

English

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

-

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

POLITIK-KOMUNIKASI

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Nurasmi

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar