e-journal

Pareto efficiency in individualistic vs. altruistic society

---

This paper aims to compare Pareto optimality for altruistic and individualistic societies to
show whether it is possible to have Pareto improvement through altruistic acts even after free market
equilibrium.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper follows conceptual, axiomatic and theoretical
approaches to show Pareto efficiency in altruistic versus individualistic societies. The paper first
outlines the welfare axioms of Islamic economics compared to those of capitalism. Second, it defines
Pareto efficiency within capitalist and Islamic economic systems. Third, it compares and contrasts the
concept in the two systems based on their epistemological and anthropological worldviews. Fourth, it
shows how – even under the efficient allocation of material goods – room for Pareto improvement still
exists through the redistribution of resources. Finally, it demonstrates optimum income transfer for
social welfare maximization.
Findings – The paper shows that Islamic economics relying on certain welfare axioms aim for an
altruistic society. It then theoretically proves that social well-being would be greater in such an altruistic
society in comparison to an individualistic society promoted by capitalism, holding everything else
constant. The paper clearly shows that free market equilibrium does not maximize social utility. It
theoretically demonstrates that even under efficient allocation of material goods, there is still room for
Pareto improvement through redistribution of resources. It reveals that optimum income transfer might
not be possible through voluntary altruistic behaviors unless people transcend self-interest and begin to
value social interest as important as their own interest. Therefore, the paper suggests a role for the
government to reach optimum-level income transfer for social welfare maximization.
Research limitations/implications – The paper is purely theoretical. Its main limitation is not to
be empirically tested. Future studies might shed light on the issue through empirical evidence
Practical implications – Pareto improvement provides important guidance or at least moral
justification for welfare programs. The paper might directly affect welfare policy of Muslim countries.
Social implications – The paper suggests income transfer through altruistic acts would provide
higher social welfare. Therefore, it is in the best interest of nations to promote altruistic behaviors and
support voluntary welfare programs for higher social utility.
Originality/value – The paper contributes to the Islamic moral economy doctrine by proving that
altruistic behaviors encouraged by Islamic teaching could provide higher social welfare.

Keywords Individualism, Welfare, Altruism, Capitalism, Islamic economics, Pareto optimality

---

Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

Humanomics

No. Panggil

-

Penerbit

: Emerald Group., 2014

Deskripsi Fisik

Humanomics Vol. 30 No. 4, 2014

Bahasa

English

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

-

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

EKONOMI

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Asmawati/Syahrial

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar