e-journal
Can Rights-Based Approaches Enhance Levels of Legitimacy and Cooperation in Conservation? A Relational Account
Abstract
Rights-based approaches (RBAs) are increasingly gaining favour among practitioners in the field of natural resource conservation and management. RBAs are a non-binding operational framework through which conservation actors can integrate human rights standards and principles into the design, planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of projects and programmes. In addition to promoting the human rights of local populations, it is also argued that RBAs may hold benefits for
conservation initiatives. This article draws on existing research on the social psychology of procedural fairness to develop a relational account of how and whether RBAs may enhance levels of legitimacy and cooperation in conservation. This relational account stresses the importance of fair experiences for generating positive feelings of legitimacy and associated cooperative behaviour among individuals interacting with organisations or authorities. On the whole, this article suggests that if RBAs can ensure respect for the human rights of local populations, they have the potential to engender
fair experiences and related positive institutional effects, thereby significantly strengthening
the overall effectiveness of conservation initiatives.
Keywords Human rights . Rights-based approaches . Environmental governance . Conservation . Procedural justice . Legitimacy
Tidak ada salinan data
Tidak tersedia versi lain