e-journal

Functional Flexibility in Women’s Commitment-Skepticism Bias

---

If a woman overestimates her romantic partner’s commitment, the cost to her fitness—reproduction without an investing partner—can be considerable. Error Management Theory predicts that women have an evolved bias to be skeptical of men’s commitment in a relationship, which reduces the likelihood of making a costly false positive error. However, because error probabilities are inversely related, this commitment-skepticism bias simultaneously increases the likelihood of missed opportunities, or false negatives. False positives when gauging a partner’s commitment are the more costly error for women, but missing an opportunity to secure a genuinely high-quality mate can also be quite costly. We predicted and found that women’s mating cognitions are functionally flexible, such that women do not exhibit the commitment skepticism bias when faced with behavioral evidence that a male partner is willing to commit (Study 1). This suggests that relationship-enhancing behaviors are one contextual cue that may lessen the bias. However, not all relationship enhancing behaviors are equally diagnostic of a person’s true commitment intent. When comparing men and women’s commitment thresholds, we found that women require more behavioral evidence than men do to feel certain of their partner’s commitment to them (Study 2).

Keywords: commitment skepticism, error management, judgment, sex differences, mating, judgment bias

---

Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

Evolutionary Psychology

No. Panggil

-

Penerbit

U.S.A : ., 2015

Deskripsi Fisik

Evolutionary Psychology 2015

Bahasa

English

ISBN/ISSN

1474-7049

Klasifikasi

-

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

Volume 13(2). 2015

Subjek

PSIKOLOGI

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Mutia/Agus

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar