e-journal
Squaring the circle: reconciling fishing and conservation of aquatic ecosystems
Size-at-entry regulations in fisheries cause major disruption to aquatic ecosystems, including truncation of age- and size-structures, destabilization of fish stocks, directional selection on phenotypic traits and a by-catch of unwanted species and sizes. Here, we use simple dynamic models of size-spectra to examine an alternative, socalled balanced harvesting. Balanced harvesting helps in retaining the approximate power-law size-structure of natural ecosystems, whereas size-at-entry regulations do not. Balanced harvesting is less likely to destabilize steady states than size-atentry regulations set close to the size at maturation. Surprisingly, our numerical results suggest that steady-state biomass yield can be substantially increased by switching from size-at-entry to balanced harvesting. On the basis of these results, we argue that the goals of conservation and of greater yields seem less difficult to
reconcile than have previously been thought. However, to work towards these goals require a change in our approach to fishing.
Keywords Balanced harvesting, fishing-induced instability, maximum sustainable yield, power-law size-structure, resilience, size-spectra
Tidak ada salinan data
Tidak tersedia versi lain