e-journal

Phylogenetic relationships within Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria,Hydrozoa) reveal unexpected generic diversity

---

Prerequisites for conservation planning are inventories of species, which are often recognised and described using
morphological clues (The House of Lords 2003; The Royal Society 2003; Mace 2004). However, taxa identification
using morphological criteria may be challenging, especially in simple organisms that present few discriminant
synapomorphies and high phenotypic plasticity, such as cnidarians [see Daly et al. (2007) for a review]. Moreover,
molecular phylogenies have shown that a morphological approach is not always representative of the diversity and
phylogenetic relationships between species, genera, families and even higher levels in Cnidaria (e.g. Bridge et al. 1992;Chen et al. 1995; Berntson 1999; Daly et al. 2003; Benzoni et al. 2010; Budd et al. 2010; Brugler et al. 2013; Arrigoni et al. 2014; Kitano et al. 2014). This general problem in Cnidaria also pertains to Hydrozoa, (e.g. Bridge et al. 1992; Schuchert 1993; Bouillon & Boero 2000; Marques & Collins 2004; Lecl
ere et al. 2009; Pe~na Cantero et al.
2009; Cartwright & Nawrocki 2010; Lindner et al. 2011),highlighting the need for a systematic revision of this
cnidarian class.

---

Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

No. Panggil

-

Penerbit

: ., 2016

Deskripsi Fisik

Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 45, 1, January 2016, pp 103–114

Bahasa

English

ISBN/ISSN

doi:10.1111/zsc.1213

Klasifikasi

-

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

BIOLOGI

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Wati/Agus

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar