Ditapis dengan
Many-Minds Arguments in Legal Theory
Abstract Many-minds arguments claim that in some way or another, groups of decisionmakers tend to make better decisions than individuals. This essay identifies five general and recurring problems with such arguments, as follows: (1) Whose minds? The group or population whose minds are at issue is often equivocal or ill-defined. (2) Many minds, worse minds. The number of minds endogenously in…
- Edisi
- -
- ISBN/ISSN
- -
- Deskripsi Fisik
- Winter 2009: Volume 1, Number 1 ~ Journal of Legal Analysis
- Judul Seri
- Journal of Legal Analysis
- No. Panggil
- -
DIVIDE AND CONQUER
ABSTRACT The maxim ‘‘divide and conquer’’ (divide et impera) is invoked frequently in law, history, and politics, but often in a loose or undertheorized way.We suggest that the maxim is a placeholder for a complex of ideas related by a family resemblance, but differing in their details, mechanisms and implications. We provide an analytic taxonomy of divide and conquer mechanisms in…
- Edisi
- -
- ISBN/ISSN
- -
- Deskripsi Fisik
- Fall 2010: Volume 2, Number 2 ~ Journal of Legal Analysis
- Judul Seri
- Journal of Legal Analysis
- No. Panggil
- -
Karya Umum 
Filsafat 
Agama 
Ilmu-ilmu Sosial 
Bahasa 
Ilmu-ilmu Murni 
Ilmu-ilmu Terapan 
Kesenian, Hiburan, dan Olahraga 
Kesusastraan 
Geografi dan Sejarah